The High Court of Patna dismissed a writ petition as withdrawn by the petitioner on the ground that it had become infructuous, delivered through an oral order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10521 of 2020
======================================================
Nityanand Pandit Son of Late Junglee Pandit, Resident of Chhoti Pahari, P.O. Bari Pahari, P.S. Agamkuan, District - Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ranjeet Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr.Lalit Kishore (Ag) ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER
2 23-06-2022 At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present writ petition has become infructuous and seeks permission to withdraw the same.
It is, thus, dismissed as withdrawn as having
become infructuous.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
Saif/-
U
Nityanand Pandit
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reform Department, Government of Bihar
District Magistrate, Patna
Deputy Collector Land Reform, Patna Sadar
Circle Officer, Patna Sadar
Sri Vijay Jawahar Pandit
Sandeep Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
