Petitioners sought withdrawal of their writ petition in Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 911 of 2022. The court granted permission for withdrawal and dismissed the petition reserving liberty to file a fresh petition.
Permission granted to withdraw the petition; petition dismissed reserving liberty to file a fresh petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.911 of 2022
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Niranjan Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr.Gyan Prakash Ojha (Ga7) For the Res 3 to 7 : Mr. Aditya Prakash Sahay, Advocate Mr. Venugopal Abhay, Advocate Mr. Harshit Gargaghey, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI
ORAL ORDER
2 23-02-2022 Heard learned counsel for respective parties.
Learned counsel for the petitioners after some
arguments seeks permission to withdraw the petition.
Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as
withdrawn reserving liberty to file fresh petition in accordance
Patna High Court CWJC No.911 of 2022(2) dt.23-02-2022 2/2
with law.
(P. B. Bajanthri, J)
Vikash/-
U
Ruby Kumari Daughter of Lal Mohan Pandit
Subran Kumar
The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna
The Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna
The Chairman, Bihar Legislative Council, Patna
The Executive Chariman, Bihar Legislative Council, Patna
P. B. Bajanthri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
