In this application for a writ in the nature of Mandamus regarding recruitment selection, the Patna High Court dismissed the petition because the petitioner failed to implead persons whose rights could be affected after being granted time to do so.
Petition stands dismissed; liberty reserved to file a fresh petition in accordance with law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5642 of 2021
======================================================
SUNITA KUMARI D/o Ramprit Sah resident of vill.- Riga, P.o. and P.s.Riga, District- Sitamarhi
... ... Petitioner/s
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Virendra Kumar For the Respondent/s : Dr.K.N.Singh, ASG : Mr. Radhika Raman , SSC : Mr. Manoj Kr. Singh, CGC ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI ORAL ORDER
5 23-02-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
following relief/reliefs:
“That this is an application for issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus and/or any other appropriate writ/writs, Order/ Orders, direction/ directions for commanding the respondents authorities to consider for selection of Petitioner on the basis of Marks obtained by her for recruitment of Constable (G.D.) in central Armed Police Force Examination 2018, since other candidate has been selected in the final result who has got lesser marks
Patna High Court CWJC No.5642 of 2021(5) dt.23-02-2022 2/2
than the petitioner mentioned in the merit list issued by respondent but the petitioner has not been selected And further prays for issuance of such other order/direction for which the petitioner may be found legally entitled to facts and circumstances in this case.”
“Petitioner’s counsel is permitted to implead such of those persons whose rights are likely to be affected, before the next date of hearing, failing which, the petition shall be dismissed.”
implead such of those persons whose rights are likely to be affected in the event of allowing the present petition.
(P. B. Bajanthri, J)
GAURAV S./-
U
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioners have made efforts to implead persons whose rights are likely to be affected as directed by the court.
Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for failure to follow the impleadment procedure.
Sunita Kumari D/o Ramprit Sah
Union of India through the Directorate General CRPF
Staff Selection Commission
Commandant, 68th B.N. SSB
Dy. Commandant, 19th B.N. SSB
Teh Asstt. Commandant, 68th B.N. SSB
P. B. Bajanthri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
