Dr. Anil Sulabh v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Hon'ble Court dismissed the writ application as infructuous upon the State counsel seeking withdrawal without extending substantive discussion.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8932 of 2015
======================================================
Dr. Anil Sulabh S/o Late Baidyanath Jha, Present - Bihar Hindi Shitya Sammelan, Kadam Kuan, Police Station - Kadam Kuan, District - Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Pramod Kumar, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. J.S. Barnwal- GA5 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER
3 22-12-2022 Heard the parties.
Learned counsel for the State has submitted that this
application has become infructuous and hence he seeks permission to withdraw this application.
It is, accordingly, dismissed as having become infructuous.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
Harsh/
U
Dr. Anil Sulabh and Bihar Hindi Shitya Sammelan
The State Of Bihar
Sandeep Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court