Oral order disposing of a writ petition pursued via representation on the day of hearing. The High Court dismissed the case without specific reasoning or relief detailed in the text provided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No 8199 of 2022
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
For the Petitioner/s : Mr Kundan Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr Ajay, GA V ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER
2 14-10-2022 This case has been taken up today for consideration through Video Conferencing.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners would be pursuing their representation (Annexure 6 series).
With liberty, as prayed, this writ petition is disposed
of.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J)
M.E.H. /-
U
Kundan Kumar Son of Birendra Kumar Singh
Prince Kumar
State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Bihar, Patna
The Joint Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Bihar, Patna
The District Magistrate, Sitamarhi
The Deputy Development Commissioner, Sitamarhi
Madhuresh Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
