The petitioner, who had assailed a termination order in separate writ proceedings, withdrew the present application. The High Court permitted the withdrawal of the writ application. No substantive legal principle was laid down.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5604 of 2021
======================================================
Rajendra Yadav, Son of Prabhu Prasad @ Prabhu Yadav, Resident of Village Bakarganj Abhanda Said Nagar, P.S. - Laheriya Sarai, District- Darbhanga, Bihar
... ... Petitioner/s
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr.Kamleshwar Pandey, Advocate For the State : Mr.Niraj Kumar, AC to GA-10 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER
2 13-10-2022 It is submitted that in view of the fact that now termination order has been assailed in a separate writ proceedings, petitioner does not wish to press this application.
Writ application is permitted to be withdrawn.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J)
PNM
U
Rajendra Yadav
State of Bihar
Madhuresh Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
