Petitioner in a civil writ petition claimed grievance redressal during pendency. The court held the petition to be infructuous and dismissed it without engaging with substantive legal issues.
Petition dismissed as infructuous due to redressal of grievance during pendency.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7593 of 2021
======================================================
Narendra Kumar Singh Son of Late Tokhaman Singh, Resident of MuhallaPakri, In Front of Urdu School, P.S.-Nawada, District-Bhojpur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Braj Kishore Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. Kumar Alok, SC-7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instruction,
submitted that during pendency of the present petition, the petitioner’s grievance has been redressed by the concerned authority.
Therefore, the present petition stands dismissed as having become infructuous.
(P. B. Bajanthri, J)
Ankit/-
U
Narendra Kumar Singh
The State of Bihar
The Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar
The Director, panchayati Raj, Bihar
The Deputy Development Commissioner-Cum-Chief Executive Officer, Bhojpur
The Chairman, Zila Parishad Bhojpur
P. B. Bajanthri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
