Petitioner, a Kendriya Vidyalaya employee, approached Patna High Court for grievance redressal. The court held jurisdiction lies with the Central Administrative Tribunal under the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1986.
Writ petition dismissed with liberty to approach Central Administrative Tribunal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6411 of 2021
======================================================
Kr. Horo Rosa @ H. Rosa Daughter of Late Thomas Horo House No. 365, Judge Colony, Kalyanpur, P.O.- Hatiya District- Ranchi (Jharkhand).
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mrs. Anima Loisa Topno, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Radhika Raman, CGC Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Pandey, Sr. Panel Counsel
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI ORAL ORDER
In the instant petition, petitioner is an employee of the Kendriya Vidyalaya. Her grievance is required to be redressed before the Central Administrative Tribunal under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1986 read with the relevant notification by which Kendriya Vidyalaya institution have been
Patna High Court CWJC No.6411 of 2021(5) dt.13-04-2022 2/2
brought under the jurisdiction of the Central Administrative Tribunal read with L. Chandra Kumar vs. Union of India and Others reported in (1997) 3 SCC 261 decision of the Apex Court.
Accordingly, writ petition stands dismissed reserving liberty to approach Central Administrative Tribunal.
(P. B. Bajanthri, J)
GAURAV S./-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a service dispute involving an employee of Kendriya Vidyalaya falls within the jurisdiction of the High Court or the Central Administrative Tribunal.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
L. Chandra Kumar vs. Union of India and OthersReferred¶24
(1997) 3 SCC 261 · Who else cites this
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Kr. Horo Rosa @ H. Rosa
State of Bihar Through the Principal Secretary, Health Department, Government of Bihar
Union of India
Secretary Department of Pension and Pensioners Welfare, Government of India
Principal Government Ayurvedic College and Hospital, Kadamkuan, Patna
Commissioner Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan (Hqr.), New Delhi
P. B. Bajanthri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
