The High Court disposed of the writ petition seeking selection as an Aanganwadi Sewika. The court directed the Appellate Authority to decide the petitioner's pending appeal within three months after providing an opportunity of hearing.
Petitioner's appeal directed to be decided within three months after providing opportunity of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6719 of 2021
======================================================
Nilu Kumari @ Nilu Devi Wife of Bittu Kumar Rai Resident of VillageJamuaon, Police Station- Piro Jamuaon, District- Bhojpur, Pin- 802159.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sunil Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr.Lalit Kishore (Ag)
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 08-02-2022
This matters heard via video conferencing due to
circumstances prevailing on account of COVID-19 Pandemic.
to 10.
with since no adverse order has been passed against her.
Patna High Court CWJC No.6719 of 2021 dt.08-02-2022 2/3
“For issuance of an appropriate writ/writs, order/orders, direction/directions towards quashing the Memo No. 239 dated 11.2.2020,whereby the District Programme Officer, ICDS, Bhojpur (Respondent No. 5) has rejected the complaint filed by the petitioner and relying upon the fake/wrong report of Civil Surgeon-cum-Chief Medical Officer, Bhojpur, Ara, which has been done without proper mark of identification (vide letter no. 332 dated 29.01.2020) and assuming the date of birth mentioned in the Educational Certificate as 10.3.1992 of one Malti Pathak (Respondent No.11) directed the Child Development Officer, Piro, Bhojpur to issue selection letter to Malti Pathak (Respondent No.11), which is completely wrong and impugn as the Medical Examination has been done without proper mark of identification/Video recording/Photo or in presence of the petitioner and thus the said Medical Report in collusion with the Private Respondent No.11, whereas the petitioner is possess with all eligibility but tried to be deprived under partiality and hence the petitioner
Patna High Court CWJC No.6719 of 2021 dt.08-02-2022 3/3
is required to be selected as Aanganwadi Sewika after ascertaining the real eligibility of both the petitioner and Respondent No.11. Further for relief/reliefs for which the petitioner is entitle under the facts and circumstances of the case.
(P. B. Bajanthri, J)
Ravi/-
| AFR/NAFR | NAFR |
|---|---|
| CAV DATE | NA |
| Uploading Date | 20.02.2022 |
| Transmission Date | NA |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to dispose of the writ petition and direct the appellate authority to decide the pending appeal within three months.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Nilu Kumari @ Nilu Devi
The State of Bihar
Malti Pathak
P. B. Bajanthri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
