In an open hearing, the Court held that petitioners lack a legal right to demand construction of a Gram Panchayat Bhawan on a specific site. The writ petition was found devoid of merit and dismissed.
The writ petition was dismissed in its original form as the petitioners had no legal right to demand construction on a specific site.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5539 of 2015
======================================================
... ... Petitioners
Versus
... ... Respondents
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioners : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Abbas Haidar, S.C.-6 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER
2 06-12-2022 Heard the parties.
In this case, the petitioners want Gram Panchayat Bhawan to be constructed on a particular site whereas, the Government has decided to construct the same on another site.
In the opinion of this Court, the petitioners have no legal right to demand for construction of a Gram Panchayat Bhawan on a particular site.
This writ petition being devoid of merit is
dismissed.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
pawan/- U
2 issues framed by the court
Whether petitioners have a legal right to demand construction of a Gram Panchayat Bhawan on a specific site.
Whether a writ petition can be maintained solely for directing construction on a chosen site without an established legal right.
Surendra Prasad Singh and Anr.
The State Of Bihar
Sandeep Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
