This single-paragraph oral order dismisses a writ petition concerning a petitioner's grievance as infructuous, noting that the grievance was redressed by the State.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21113 of 2014
======================================================
Akhilanand Sharma Son of Basudeo Prasad Singh Resident of Village - Bakhtiyarpur, Police Station and Post Office - Paliganj, District - Patna, presently posted as B.C.G., Technician in the Office of the District Tuberclosis Centre, Nalanda.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr.Upendra Kumar, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Nadeem Seraj GP20
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER
2 05-12-2022 Heard the parties.
Learned counsel for the State submits that the
grievance of the petitioner has been redressed and hence, the writ petition has become infructuous.
The writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
BT/- U
Akhilanand Sharma
The State Of Bihar
Sandeep Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
