The court dismissed the petition in a writ petition where parties agreed the application had become infructuous after the petitioner's suspension was revoked.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4818 of 2019
======================================================
Kailash Singh, aged about 45 years, male, Son of Late Rajendra Singh R/o Village- Adhgain, P.O.-Inderwa, P.S.-Parihar, District-Sitamarhi
... ... Petitioner
Versus
... ... Respondents
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashhar Mustafa, Adv. For the State : Mr. Rajesh Kr. Sinha AC to GP-23 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER
11 19-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
counsel for the State.
has become infructuous, in view of the events subsequent to filing of the writ petition, whereby the petitioner’s suspension stands revoked.
become infructuous.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J)
shyambihari/-
U
Kailash Singh
The State of Bihar
Madhuresh Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
