Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ application to agitate claims elsewhere. The court acknowledged the request and dismissed the petition accordingly.
Permission to withdraw application allowed; petition dismissed with liberty to agitate claim.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4775 of 2016
======================================================
Anita Kumari D/o Sri Arjun Pandey, resident of Village- Jamanganj, Makhdumpur, District- Jehanabad.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ankit Katriar, Advocate Mr. Rikesh Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Vivek Prasad- Gp18 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL ORDER
5 17-02-2022
Mr. Ankit Katriar, learned Advocate on instructions from Mr. Shakib Ayaz, learned Advocate on record, in presence of Mr. Vivek Prasad, GP-18, seeks permission to withdraw this application in order to agitate his claim before an appropriate forum.
The petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.
(Ashutosh Kumar, J)
krishna/-
U
Anita Kumari D/o Sri Arjun Pandey
The State Of Bihar and Ors
Ashutosh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
