Allowed

Sunil Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC16 Feb 2022CR. MISC./14606/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a kidnapping and abduction case, relying on the victim's statement indicating a consensual run-away and desire to marry, directing surrender within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Allowed anticipatory bail subject to surrender before Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate within four weeks and furnishing bail bonds.

Sunil Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14606 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-53 Year-2020 Thana- RASULPUR District- Saran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Sunil Yadav, aged about 32 years, male, Son of Subash Yadav, Resident of Village- Mishra Giri Ke Mathiya, P.S.- Bairiya, District- Balia (Uttar Pradesh).

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Ms. Prerna Anand, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR

¶10

ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 16-02-2022 Heard the counsel for the parties.

¶12

The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his

¶13

arrest in connection with Rasulpur P.S. Case No. 53 of 2020, dated 08.06.2020, instituted for the offences under Sections 363, 366-A and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

The daughter of the informant is said to have been

¶15

kidnapped and forcibly married to the petitioner.

¶16

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner

¶17

that the accusation is absolutely false. The victim girl though claims her age to be 17 years but has stated in her Section 164 Cr.P.C. statement that because of being

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14606 of 2021(3) dt.16-02-2022 2/2

¶19

annoyed with her mother, who wanted to make her do the daily household chores, she ran away from the house. However, she has admitted that she is in love with the petitioner and would like to marry him.

¶20

Considering the afore-noted statement of the victim girl under Section 164 Cr.P.C., the petitioner, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate-XI, Saran at Chapra in connection with Rasulpur P.S. Case No. 53 of 2020, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶21

The application stands allowed.

¶22

(Ashutosh Kumar, J)

¶23

Praveen-II/-

¶24

U T

Sunil Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunil Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanjay Ray Vs The State of Bihar

Bijli Bhagat @ Bijli Bhagata Vs the State of Bihar

Upendra Kumar @ Upendra Paswan @ Dharmendra Kumar @ Dharmendra Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Lakshman Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Akhilesh Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Snehdeep Kumar Vs The Union of India