28. After coming into force of the 2017 Recruitment Rules, the Appointing Authority had changed, and the Registrar General of the High Court became the Appointing Authority. A “Centralized Selection and Appointment Committee” constituted by the High Court under Rule 6(i) was to carry out the process of selection. Therefore, it is apparent that the 2017 Recruitment Rules substantially altered the Appointing Authority and process of selection. Method of selection, staffing pattern, life of panel etc., have all been altered under the 2017 Recruitment Rules. The petitioners, thus, cannot claim that even after coming into force of the new 2017 Recruitment Rules, the respondent was under any legal obligation to continue to fill up vacancies, as per the old and repealed 2009 Rules. Judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Renu (supra) and Uma Devi (supra), therefore, are distinguishable on facts and, therefore, would have no application in the facts and circumstances of the present case. The petitioners, therefore, in the opinion of this Court, have no right by virtue of