This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 17399 of 2016
======================================================
Nita Devi Wife of Satya Narayan Yadav, Resident of Village - Ahra,
Kushumjori Gram Panchayat, Chandan, District- Banka.
... ... Petitioner
Banka.
... ... Respondents
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Srivastava, Adv. For the State : Md. Raisul Haque, SC-10 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER
counsel for the State.
This matter has been listed, on the motion slip being filed by the petitioner’s counsel, under the heading ‘TO BE MENTIONED’.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to events subsequent of filing of the writ petition, the same has become infructuous.
The position is not disputed by the learned State
counsel.
Accordingly, the writ application is dismissed as
Patna High Court CWJC No.17399 of 2016(2) dt.28-09-2022 2/2
having become infructuous.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J)
shyambihari/-
U
Nita Devi
State of Bihar
Madhuresh Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
