Surendra Rai v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Oral order dismissing a writ petition for want of prosecution as the petitioner's counsel sought to pass over the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.200 of 2018
======================================================
Surendra Rai Son of late Ramanuj Rai Resident of Village- Musepur, P.S. Garhpura, District Begusarai.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dilip Kumar Roy For the Respondent/s : Mr. Raj Ballabh Prasad Yadav- Aag11
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER
Today, when the matter is taken up, petitioner’s
counsel seeks pass over.
Matter is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J)
SUMIT/- U
Surendra Rai
State Of Bihar
District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Begusarai
District Co-operative Officer, Begusarai
Managing Director-cum-Member Secretary, District Samvarg Cooperative Committee Ltd., Begusarai
Assistant Registrar, Co-operative Societies, District- Begusarai
Madhuresh Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court