A writ application assailing an order of termination was dismissed without adjudication on merits because the petitioner failed to appear and prosecute the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1853 of 2018
======================================================
Shyama Devi, Daughter of Late Ram Keshwar Rai, Resident of MohallaProfessor Colony Hajipur, P.S.- Hajipur Town, District- Vaishali.
... ... Petitioner/s
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr.Rajeshwar Singh, GA10
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER
2 05-09-2022
Learned Counsel for the State has submitted that
application is barred by delay and latches apart from the fact that the appointment itself was illegal, having been obtained by fraud representation.
Learned Counsel for the petitioner is not appearing. Therefore, without going into merits of the submissions advanced by learned Counsel for the State, application is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J)
shashank/-
U
Shyama Devi
State Of Bihar
Madhuresh Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
