Disposed

Reymad Chaurhe v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC14 Jul 2022CWJC/1890/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought permanent settlement of agricultural lands and quashing of encroachment proceedings. Court granted liberty to file representation with the Circle Officer for appropriate decision within four weeks and disposed of the petition. Discharged, not disposed on merits.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to petitioner to file representation with Circle Officer for decision within four weeks. Petition disposed on this basis.

Reymad Chaurhe Vs The State of Bihar — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1890 of 2020

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Reymad Chaurhe Wife of Late Bhim Murmu, Resident of Village- Olipur, Police Station- Manihari, District- Katihar

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the District Officer-cum-Collector, Katihar

¶7

The Circle Officer, Manihari, Katihar

¶8

... ... Respondent/s

¶9

======================================================

¶10

Appearance :

¶11

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Kamlesh Kumar Pathak For the Respondent/s : Mr.Sajid Salim Khan (Sc25) ======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 14-07-2022

¶14

The present writ petition has been filed seeking the

¶15

following reliefs:-

¶16

“(I) For direction to the Respondents authorities to take suitable steps for making permanent settlement of lands appertaining to Mauza Fatehnagar, Thana No. 287, Khata No. 1101, Khesra Nos. 3335, 3432, Area 1.32 Acre (0.82+0.50 decimal respectively) in favours of the petitioner who has been in continuous possession and in actual cultivation over it in more than 40 years and in pursuance thereof the Respondent no. 2 subsequently settled it in favour of the petitioner’s year to year settlement vide settlement Case No. 9 of 2007-08.

¶17

(II) For quashing the proceedings of encroachment Case No. 10 of 2019-20 and the notice dated 04.09.2019 bu which the Respondent authorities mechanically and illegally directed this petitioner to

¶18

Patna High Court CWJC No.1890 of 2020(2) dt.14-07-2022 2/2

¶19

make oust herself from the land appertaining to Mauza Fatehnagar, Thana No. 287, Khata No. 1101, Khesra No. 3335, Area 82 decimal without considering the actual position of the case.”

¶20

At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty to approach the Circle Officer, Manihar, Katihar by filing appropriate objection/ representation. Liberty so sought is granted.

¶21

It is needless to state that in case appropriate objection/ representation is filed within a period of four weeks from today, the Circle Officer, Manihari, Katihar, shall consider his case and take appropriate decision in accordance with law.

¶22

The petition stands disposed of on the aforesaid terms.

¶23

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)

¶24

Tiwary/-

¶25

Reymad Chaurhe v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Reymad Chaurhe v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kamali Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Umeshwar Prasad Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Pankaj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ram Krishna Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Sushil Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Yogendra Prasad Singh @ Bhagwat Singh Vs The State of Bihar