Pinki Kumari v. The State of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed a writ petition for want of prosecution due to lack of representation by the petitioner and absence of a prayer for adjournment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10619 of 2019
======================================================
Pinki Kumari, Wife of Sri Manoj Kevat @ Manoj Kumar, resident of VillageChakdilawar, P.S.- Deep Nagar, District- Nalanda.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr.S. K. Manadal, SC3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER
none to represent the petitioner.
Today again there is none to represent the petitioner,
nor there is any prayer for adjournment.
Writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J)
shashank/- U
Pinki Kumari
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department
The Principal Secretary Social Welfare, Department Govt. of Bihar
The District Magistrate, Nalanda
The District Programme, Officer, Nalanda
The Child Development Officer, Nalanda at Biharsharif (Rural)
Madhuresh Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court