Kundan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear before the court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15866 of 2018
======================================================
Kundan Kumar, Son of Sanichar Paswan, Ward No. 14, Resident of VillageMeghauna, P.S.- Alauli, District- Khagaria.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
... ... Respondents
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : None. For the Respondent No. 3 : Mr. K.K. Sinha, Adv. For the State : Mr. S.D. Yadav, AAG-9 with Mr. Nagindra Kumar, AC to AAG-9 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER
2 11-10-2022 None appears for the petitioner.
In presence of learned counsel for respondents, this
writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J)
M.E.H. /-
U
Kundan Kumar
The State Of Bihar
Madhuresh Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court