Hearing a writ application, the court relied on a previous decision (L.P.A. No. 535 of 2017) finding the petitioner had no enforceable claim, and disposed of the application accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14611 of 2018
======================================================
Ajeet Kumar Singh, Son of Umesh Prasad Singh, Resident of Village - Kalyanpur, P.O. Silari, Police Station - Karghar, District - Rohtas at Sasaram.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
... ... Respondents
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, Adv. For the State : Mr. Vinay Kriti Singh, GA-2
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER
2 10-10-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
counsel for the State.
It is submitted by the petitioner’s counsel in view of decision passed in L.P.A. No. 535 of 2017, the petitioner has no enforceable claim.
In view of such submission, the writ application is disposed of.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J)
shyambihari/-
U
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
L.P.A. No. 535 of 2017Referred¶18
Ajeet Kumar Singh
The State Of Bihar
The Principal Secretary, Department of Planning and Development, Government of Bihar
The Director, Department of Planning and Development
The Joint Director-cum-Office Head, Department of Planning and Development
The District Statistical Officer, Rohtas
Madhuresh Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
