The Court heard a writ petition seeking quashing of office orders rejecting regularization and termination, and directed monetary benefits according to a previous judgment.
Directed respondent to extend monetary benefits as per the order in C.W.J.C. No. 19703 of 2019 within four months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1185 of 2022
======================================================
Ram Das Mishra S/o Ram Surat Mishra, Resident of Village/Mohalla - Nagrah, near post office Naugachia, P.O.- Nagara, P.S.- Naugachia, District - Bhagalpur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Alok Ranjan, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Vinay Kirti Singh, GA 2
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 20-04-2022
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
following relief/reliefs:
“(I) For quashing office order as contained in letter no. 97 dated 14.01.2019 issued under the signature of Chief Engineer, irrigation
Patna High Court CWJC No.1185 of 2022 dt.20-04-2022
2/3
creation Water resources Department, Bhagalpur, by which the claim of the petitioner for regularization/absorption of his services has been rejected in a most arbitrary, discriminatory, illegal and unreasonable manner.
(II) For quashing the letter no. 686 dated 12.09.2016 issued by respondent authority by which the services of the petitioner has been terminated.
(III) For a directing and commanding the respondent authorities to consider the case of the petitioner for absorption and regularization of the services of the petitioner and to grant all the consequential benefits attached to it after regularization from the date from which petitioner is entitled/from initial date of engagement in the Department.
(IV) For any other appropriate relief/reliefs to which the petitioner is found entitled in the facts and circumstances of this case.”
Patna High Court CWJC No.1185 of 2022 dt.20-04-2022 3/3
(P. B. Bajanthri, J)
GAURAV S./-
| AFR/NAFR | |
|---|---|
| CAV DATE | |
| Uploading Date | 22.04.2022 |
| Transmission Date |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to regularization/absorption of services and monetary benefits based on a prior Writ Court order.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
C.W.J.C No. 19703 of 2019Relied on¶30
Ram Das Mishra
The State of Bihar
Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department
Joint Secretary, Water Resources Department
Engineer-In-Chief (Middle), Water Resources Department
Chief Engineer, Irrigation Creation, Water Resources Department
P. B. Bajanthri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
P. B. Bajanthri
Parties & counsel
