Vinod Kumar v. The Union Of India and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner withdrew the writ application without pressing it; the court permitted the withdrawal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1139 of 2018
======================================================
Vinod Kumar Son of Late Yadunandan Roy, Resident of Village- Mishralia, P.S.- Sakra, District- Muzaffarpur at present residing at Hasanpur P.S. Muffasil District Samastipur and presently posted at 159 BN CRPF Gaya Bihar.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Ram Prawesh Kumar, Adv. For the UOI : Ms. Kanak Verma, CGC.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER
4 12-09-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
counsel for the Union of India.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he
does not wish to press this writ application.
Accordingly, the same is permitted to be withdrawn.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J)
shyambihari/-
U
Vinod Kumar
Union of India
Special Director General of Police, Central Zone C.R.P.F. Kolkata
Inspector General of Police Force, Bihar Sector Central Reserve Police Force, Patna
Deputy Inspector General of Police, Central Reserve Police Force, Muzaffarpur
Deputy Inspector General of Police, Central Reserve Police Force, Agartala
Madhuresh Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court