Allowed

Randhir Ram v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC2 Nov 2022CR. MISC./9971/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This oral order granted anticipatory bail to petitioners apprehending arrest in a case involving assault, injuries, and false implication. The court directed release upon surrender within four weeks subject to bail bonds and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted; petitioners to be released on bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties upon arrest or surrender within four weeks.

Randhir Ram Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9971 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-553 Year-2021 Thana- LAKHISARAI District- Lakhisarai

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Randhir Ram Son Of Nago Ram @ Nageshwar Ram Resident Of Village - Damodarpur, Naya Tola, P.S. And District - Lakhisarai.

¶5

Pantush Ram @ Phantush Ram Son Of Nago Ram @ Nageshwar Ram Resident Of Village - Damodarpur, Naya Tola, P.S. And District - Lakhisarai.

¶6

Dharmendra @ Dharo Ram @ Dharamveer Kumar Son Of Nago Ram @ Nageshwar Ram Resident Of Village - Damodarpur, Naya Tola, P.S. And District - Lakhisarai.

¶7

Shakti Ram @ Shiv Shakti Kumar Son Of Nago Ram @ Nageshwar Ram Resident Of Village - Damodarpur, Naya Tola, P.S. And District - Lakhisarai.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶12

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER

¶13

3 02-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

¶14

APP for the State.

¶15

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

Allegedly, it is a case of assault due to which informant sustained injuries.

¶17

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9971 of 2022(3) dt.02-11-2022 2/2

¶19

further submits that the injury sustained by the informant is found to be simple in nature. There is case and counter case between the parties and both parties have sustained injuries as alleged in separate occurrence. Petitioners have clean antecedent.

¶20

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

¶21

Considering the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioners, above named in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Lakhisarai in connection with Lakhisarai P.S. Case No. 553 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶22

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

¶23

Brajesh Kumar/-

¶24

U T

Randhir Ram v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Randhir Ram v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sampat Kumar @ Sampat Kumar Chodhary Vs The State of Bihar

Deobrat Sharma @ Devrat Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Sunil Kumar Rai @ Sunil Rai Vs the State of Bihar

Ankita Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Santosh Singh @ Amit Kumar Vs the State of Bihar