Allowed

Sunil Kumar Rai @ Sunil Rai v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC2 Nov 2022CR. MISC./8306/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a murder case (IPC 302) involving false implication. The petitioner was ordered to surrender or face arrest within four weeks, furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, and comply with CrPC Section 438(2) conditions.

What did the court decide?

Grant of anticipatory bail on surrender or arrest within four weeks by furnishing Rs. 10,000 bail bond with two sureties.

Sunil Kumar Rai @ Sunil Rai Vs the State of Bihar — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8306 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-213 Year-2021 Thana- RAGHOPUR District- Vaishali

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Sunil Kumar Rai @ Sunil Rai Son Of Ram Briksh Rai R/O Village- Jafarabad Tok, P.S.- Raghopur (Rustampur O.P.), District- Vaishali

... ... Petitioner/S

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Vinod Shanker Modi, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 02-11-2022

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

APP for the State and also perused the case diary along with the postmortem report.

¶14

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302 and 120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

Allegedly, it is a case of murder of the husband of the informant and the dead body was found near Toka river.

¶16

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that there is no specific material and direct evidence to show the complicity of the petitioner in the offence and only on the mere suspicion, the name of the petitioner has been implicated in this case. The postmortem report also shows

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8306 of 2022(3) dt.02-11-2022 2/2

¶18

that cause of death is due to asphyxia.

¶19

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

¶20

Considering the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioner, above named in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Mrs. Anjali Neg, Judicial Magistrate-I Class, Hajipur, Vaishali/concerned Court in connection with Raghopur (Rautanpur O.P.) P.S. Case No. 213 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶21

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

¶22

Brajesh Kumar/- U T

Sunil Kumar Rai @ Sunil Rai v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunil Kumar Rai @ Sunil Rai v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sampat Kumar @ Sampat Kumar Chodhary Vs The State of Bihar

Deobrat Sharma @ Devrat Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Ankita Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Santosh Singh @ Amit Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Randhir Ram Vs The State of Bihar