Allowed

Aryan Kumar @ Dinesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC1 Nov 2022CR. MISC./9373/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an application for anticipatory bail in a case alleging murder and assault, the court granted bail on grounds that specific allegations were against co-accused, not the petitioners, directing surrender within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners enlarged on bail on surrendering within four weeks by furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount.

Aryan Kumar @ Dinesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9373 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-297 Year-2021 Thana- RAJAPAKAR District- Vaishali

¶3

======================================================

¶4

ARYAN KUMAR @ DINESH KUMAR SON OF RAJ KARAN SINGH R/O VILLAGE- RAJAPAKAR WEST, P.S.- RAJAPAKAR, DISTRICTVAISHALI

¶5

RAJ KARAN SINGH SON OF JAWAHAR SINGH R/O VILLAGE- RAJAPAKAR WEST, P.S.- RAJAPAKAR, DISTRICT- VAISHALI

¶6

ASHOK KUMAR SINGH @ PAPPU SON OF JAWAHAR SINGH R/O VILLAGE- RAJAPAKAR WEST, P.S.- RAJAPAKAR, DISTRICTVAISHALI

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶11

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Vishal Saurabh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Satyendra Prasad ======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER

¶13

4 01-11-2022

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

¶15

The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with Rajapakar P.S. Case no. 297 of 2021 instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 341, 323, 302, 379 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

As per allegation in the FIR, while the informant’s father, namely Kusheshwar Singh was returning after casting his vote from booth, near Durga tample, all FIR named accused persons surrounded him and started to assault him brutally with iron

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9373 of 2022(4) dt.01-11-2022 2/3

¶18

rod and danda. In the way to hospital, he succumbed to injuries. It is further alleged that when his family members came there to rescue him, they were also beaten up by the accused persons.

¶19

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. General and omnibus allegations have been levelled against the petitioners for assaulting him by fist and leg. They have got no criminal antecedent. Informant is not an eye witness of the present incident. Specific allegation is against co-accused Jai Chandra Singh and Shivchandra Singh, who have assaulted informant’s father with iron rod and co-accused Birchandra Singh and Sunil Kumar have assaulted him by lathi and danda as a result of which he died.

¶20

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of bail and submitted that informant’s father died due to internal injuries by assault. From perusal of the case diary, it appears that postmortem report is not annexed with the case diary but in para 64 of the supervision report of police officials, it is mentioned that cause of death due to above said injuries.

¶21

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that specific allegation of assault is not against the petitioners, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9373 of 2022(4) dt.01-11-2022 3/3

¶23

a period of four weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Rajapakar P.S. Case no. 297 of 2021, they will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1^st Class, Vaishali at Hajipur subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶24

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

¶25

sushma/- U

Aryan Kumar @ Dinesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Aryan Kumar @ Dinesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Nasiruddin Khan Vs The State of Bihar

Anil Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Vikash Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Rajesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sampat Kumar @ Sampat Kumar Chodhary Vs The State of Bihar

Deobrat Sharma @ Devrat Sharma Vs The State of Bihar