Allowed

Anil Sah v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC19 Oct 2022CR. MISC./39423/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a criminal case involving offences under the IPC, SC & ST Act, and POCSO Act. The petitioner was ordered to produce himself within four weeks and furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties and producing before the court below within four weeks.

Anil Sah Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39423 of 2022

¶2

¶3

CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.1619 of 2022

¶4

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-13 Year-2022 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Saharsa

¶5

======================================================

¶6

ANIL SAH Son of Sri Bindeshwari Sah @ Bino Sah Resident of villageMahua Bazar PS- Basnahi District- Saharsa

¶7

... ... Petitioner/s

¶8

Versus

¶9

The State of Bihar

¶10

Seema Devi Wife of Pappu Sada Resident of vilage- Mahua Bazar, Ward No. 3 Ps- Basnahi District- Saharsa

¶11

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Usha Kumari 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER

¶12

3 19-10-2022

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶14

APP for the State.

¶15

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 376, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act and Sections 3(i) (r) (s), 3(1)(w)(i) (ii), 3(2) (va) of the SC & ST Act.

¶16

As per prosecution case is that co-accused Sarfaraz forcefully committed rape upon the daughter of the informant

¶17

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that there is specific allegation of rape is against

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39423 of 2022(3) dt.19-10-2022 2/2

¶19

co-accused Sarfaraz and not against this petitioner. He further submits that similarly situated co-accused has been granted anticipatory bail by this Court passed in Cr. Misc. No. 27421 of 2022.

¶20

Learned APP appearing for the State opposed the anticipatory bail.

¶21

Considering the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Juudge-I-cum-Special Judge (POCSO), Saharsa in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 13 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶22

Brajesh Kumar/- U

¶23

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

Anil Sah v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anil Sah v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ratan Ray Vs the State of Bihar

Indal Sahni Vs the State of Bihar

Akhter Farookhi @ Akhter Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Amitabh Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Md. Nasiruddin Khan Vs The State of Bihar

Vikash Kumar Vs the State of Bihar