Prahlad Sahni @ Pahlad Kumar v. The State of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9095 of 2022
In
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2137 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-145 Year-2020 Thana- SHYAMPUR BHATHA District-
Sheohar
======================================================
Prahlad Sahni @ Pahlad Kumar Son of Amod Sahni Resident of VillageLaksaminiya, Post- Dumari Katsari, Police Station- Shyampur Bhatha, District- Sheohar, Bihar.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Abhijeet Gautam For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Rajendra Singh ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER
2 02-03-2022
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
The petitioner has filed the instant application for modification of order dated 04.01.2022, whereby the father name of petitioner is wrongly typed as “late Mangal Sahni” instead of “Amod Sahni”
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the father name of petitioner has wrongly been mentioned in the petition as “ late Mangal Sahni” instead of “Amod Sahni.”
In view of the submission above, this application is allowed. The order dated 04.01.2022 passed in Cr. Misc. No.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9095 of 2022(2) dt.02-03-2022 2/2
2137 of 2021 is modified to the above stated extent that the petitioner shall surrender before the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, 1st Sheohar in connection with Shyampur Bhatha P.S.Case No. 145 of 2020, within a period of further four weeks from today.
The remaining part of the order shall remain unchanged.
The application stands allowed to the above extent.
(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)
N.K/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an application seeking correction of a wrong typing of the petitioner's father's name in the petition ought to be allowed.
Prahlad Sahni
The State of Bihar
Sunil Kumar Panwar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court