Allowed

Aaditya Raj @ Guddu Mishra v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC2 Mar 2022CR. MISC./22342/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Patna, on a prayer for anticipatory bail, granted relief to the petitioner who faced charges under IPC Sections 272/273 and Bihar Excise Act Section 30(a). The court directed surrender within four weeks and set a bail bond condition of Rs 10,000 plus two sureties subject to CrPC Section 438(2).

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail by furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, to surrender within four weeks.

Aaditya Raj @ Guddu Mishra Vs The State of Bihar — Cheque Dishonour | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22342 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-379 Year-2020 Thana- BIBHUTIPUR District- Samastipur

¶3

====================================================== AADITYA RAJ @ GUDDU MISHRA SON OF LAL BABU MISHRA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- CHAKHABIB, POLICE STATIONBIBHUTIPUR, DISTRICT- SAMASTIPUR

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶8

====================================================== Appearance :

¶9

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ranjit Kumar Yadav For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 02-03-2022

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶13

The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Bibhutipur P.S. Case no. 379 of 2020 instituted for the offence under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30 (a) of the Bihar Prohibition of Excise Act.

¶14

Prosecution case relates to recovery of 2816 liters of IMFL from three different vehicles.

¶15

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has got no criminal antecedent. Petitioner has no concern with the alleged recovery or with the vehicles in

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22342 of 2021(3) dt.02-03-2022 2/2

¶17

question. The name of the petitioner has been disclosed in this case by the local chowkidar, which has no evidentiary value in the eye of law. Neither the petitioner was arrested nor any incriminating article has been recovered from his possession.

¶18

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of Bail.

¶19

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Bibhutipur P.S. Case no. 379 of 2020, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/(Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.D.J.-cum-Special Judge (Excise), Samastipur subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶20

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

¶21

sushma/-

¶22

Aaditya Raj @ Guddu Mishra v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Aaditya Raj @ Guddu Mishra v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gagan Kumar Maharaj @ Lala @ Raushan Maharaj Vs the State of Bihar

Arun Yadav @ Arun Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Ali Asgar @ Sheikh Ali Asgar Vs the State of Bihar

Dugi Lal Yadav @Durgi Lal Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Saurav Kumar @ Chhotu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Prahlad Sahni @ Pahlad Kumar Vs The State of Bihar