The High Court at Patna granted permission to the petitioner to withdraw his anticipatory bail application, consequentially dismissing the application as withdrawn.
Permission was accorded to withdraw the anticipatory bail application; application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8891 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-861 Year-2019 Thana- RAMKRISHNANAGAR District- Patna
======================================================
UPENDRA KUMAR TIWARI SON OF RANGNATH TIWARI R/O VILLAGE- GORKHARI, P.S.- VIKRAM, DISTRICT- PATNA
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gyanendra Kumar Shukla, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Madhuri Lata, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
ORAL ORDER
2 05-09-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
A.P.P. for the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to
withdraw the present anticipatory bail application.
Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, the present anticipatory bail application
is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
Shivam/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the anticipatory bail application.
Upendra Kumar Tiwari
The State of Bihar
Satyavrat Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
