Allowed

Anil Ram v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC2 Sept 2022CR. MISC./8511/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Patna granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners in an FIR under various Sections of IPC. The applicants, if arrested or surrendering within six weeks, were directed to be released on bail with sureties, subject to Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners granted anticipatory bail with bonds of Rs. 10,000 each and two sureties, conditional on surrender to the Court below within six weeks.

Anil Ram Vs the State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8511 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-123 Year-2021 Thana- CHAINPUR District- Kaimur (Bhabua)

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Anil Ram, Son Of Late Rorakh Ram R/O Village Neura, P.S. Chainpur, District - Kaimur At Bhabhua.

¶5

Parduman Ram, Son Of Late Rorakh Ram R/O Village Neura, P.S. Chainpur, District - Kaimur At Bhabhua.

... ... Petitioner/S

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Tribhuwan Narayan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shailendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 02-09-2022

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned APP for the State through video conferencing.

¶13

The petitioners seek bail in anticipation of their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 324, 326, 307, 427 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on 24.06.2021, seven accused persons including the petitioners came variously armed and started abusing to which informant protested. Thereafter, it is alleged that Komal Ram assaulted the informant with Ballam on his chest, Sanjay Ram assaulted Chauthi Ram with Balla and all the other accused persons assaulted the victim with lathi and sticks. Further, destroyed the

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8511 of 2022(2) dt.02-09-2022 2/2

¶16

bamboo asbestos and submersible pump of the house.

¶17

The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case. It is next submitted that specific allegation of assault is against Komal Ram and Sanjay Ram and as far as these petitioners are concerned, the allegation against them are general and omnibus in nature.

¶18

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposes the anticipatory bail application.

¶19

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners, above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, are directed to be released on bail on their furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Chainpur P. S. Case No.123 of 2021, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶20

The application stands allowed.

¶21

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶22

vikash/-

¶23

U T

Anil Ram v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anil Ram v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shiv Shankar Verma Vs The State of Bihar

Sandeep Singh @ Sandeep Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Nagendra Mishra Vs The State of Bihar

Moti Mandal Vs The State of Bihar

Sheela Khatoon @ Shila Vs the State of Bihar

Sunil Yadav Vs The State of Bihar