The Patna High Court allowed the petitioner's request to withdraw the anticipatory bail petition and dismissed the matter as withdrawn in an oral order. No substantive legal reasoning was provided.
Prayer to withdraw the anticipatory bail petition allowed; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8823 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-73 Year-2018 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Siwan
======================================================
RAHUL KUMAR SON OF NAG LAL PRASAD @ NAND LAL PRASAD R/O VILLAGE- SATWAR, P.S.- G.B.NAGAR, DISTRICT- SIWAN
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Bijay Prakash Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Umeshanand Pandit ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
5 01-11-2022 After some argument, learned counsel for the
petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail petition.
Prayer is allowed.
This anticipatory bail petition is, accordingly,
dismissed as withdrawn.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
BKS/-
U T
Rahul Kumar
The State of Bihar
Prabhat Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
