Allowed

Sujit Kumar @ Pintu Mandal v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC1 Nov 2022CR. MISC./3332/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner charged with offences under Sections 406, 420, and 120(B) IPC. The court considered the amicable settlement of the dispute and the return of money by the petitioner before allowing the prayer.

What did the court decide?

Prayer for anticipatory bail allowed; petitioner to be enlarged on bail upon arrest/surrender within six weeks upon furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

Sujit Kumar @ Pintu Mandal Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3332 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-198 Year-2021 Thana- LAXMIPUR District- Jamui

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SUJIT KUMAR @ PINTU MANDAL SON OF SRI BHUPENDRA MANDAL RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AND POST OFFICE MATIA POLICE STATION LAXMIPUR, DISTRICT- JAMUI

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

Rana Randhir Kumar Sharma S/o Late Kishor Sharma, R/o Vill + Post Matiya PS Laxmipur, District – Jamui.

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

======================================================

¶11

Appearance :

¶12

For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s :

¶13

Mr.Ravi Shanker Pankaj Mr.Mukeshwar Dayal

¶14

======================================================

¶15

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶16

6 01-11-2022

¶17

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶18

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case

¶19

registered for the offence under Sections 406, 420, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.

¶20

It is submitted on behalf of petitioner that with the intervention of well-wishers, good sense prevailed between the parties and both parties have amicably settled the dispute. The petitioner has already returned the money to the complainant. This submission has been made in paragraph – 4 of the supplementary affidavit.

¶21

Considering the same, the prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner is allowed. Let the above-named petitioner, in the

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3332 of 2022(6) dt.01-11-2022 2/2

¶23

event of arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.1st Class, Jamui in connection with Laxmipur P.S. Case No. 198 of 2021, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶24

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

¶25

anay/-

¶26

U T

Sujit Kumar @ Pintu Mandal v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sujit Kumar @ Pintu Mandal v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mahraj Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Shankar Prasad Jaiswal Vs The State of Bihar

Naulesh Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Santosh Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Khilari Singh @ Kheladi Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Rahul Kumar Vs The State of Bihar