This order grants anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case involving financial irregularity under Section 409 IPC. The court directed the petitioner to surrender within four weeks and specified bail conditions.
The petitioner is enlarged on bail on furnishing Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each and surrendering within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8475 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-271 Year-2020 Thana- ATHMALGOLA District- Patna
======================================================
RAJESH RAM Son of Brija Ram @ Brij Ram Resident of Village- Kamrapar, P.S.- Athamalgola, District- Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Dipak Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Parmeshwar Mehta ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER
2 08-08-2022
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP for the State.
The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Athmalgola P.S. Case no. 271 of 2020 instituted for the offence under Sections 409, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Prosecution case relates to financial irregularity committed by the petitioner under the scheme of Chief Minister’s Seven Nischaya Yojana.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. The petitioner denies the signature which is available in the alleged register, and submitted that the alleged signature is in the name of Rajesh Kumar whereas the petitioner is Rajesh
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8475 of 2022(2) dt.08-08-2022 2/2
Ram. He has got no criminal antecedent.
Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of Bail.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Athmalgola P.S. Case no. 271 of 2020, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/(Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Barh subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)
sushma/- U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail to prevent his arrest in the pending case.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rajesh Ram
The State of Bihar
Sunil Kumar Panwar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
