Allowed

Ranjeet Sah @ Ranjeet Sahu v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC8 Aug 2022CR. MISC./7072/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to Ranjeet Sah, a cousin father-in-law of the deceased, falsely implicated in a dowry-death charge. The court directed surrender within four weeks and amount of bond on bail with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to surrender within four weeks and be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

Ranjeet Sah @ Ranjeet Sahu Vs The State of Bihar — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7072 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-481 Year-2021 Thana- BEGUSARAI TOWN District- Begusarai

¶3

======================================================

¶4

RANJEET SAH @ RANJEET SAHU Sonof Late Dinesh Sah @ Dinesh Sah Resident of Village- Baghi, Ward No.25, P.S.- Town, District- Begusarai.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sandip Kumar Gautam For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Matloob Rab ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 08-08-2022

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶12

APP for the State.

¶13

The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Town P.S. Case no. 481 of 2021 instituted for the offence under Sections 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

¶14

The accusation is of killing the daughter of the informant for non-fulfillment of dowry demand.

¶15

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is cousin father-in-law of the deceased and has been falsely implicated in this case. He has no concern with the daily activity of the deceased and her husband. He lives separately. The sole responsibility to take care of wife

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7072 of 2022(2) dt.08-08-2022 2/2

¶17

is upon husband and not against his family members. Husband of the deceased is in custody. Similarly situated co-accused person has already been granted anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 28.6.2022 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 60302 of 2021.

¶18

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of Bail.

¶19

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Town P.S. Case no. 481 of 2021, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Begusarai subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶20

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

¶21

sushma/-

¶22

Ranjeet Sah @ Ranjeet Sahu v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ranjeet Sah @ Ranjeet Sahu v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kulendra Yadav @ Kulendra Kumar Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Jatta Devi Vs the State of Bihar

Shiv Kumar Chaubey Vs The State of Bihar

Ram Avatar Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Mukesh Rai Vs the State of Bihar

Rajesh Ram Vs the State of Bihar