Allowed

Mithun Kumar @ Mithun Kumar Sahni v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC11 Jul 2022CR. MISC./8079/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application, the Patna High Court granted release to the petitioner, who was not named in the initial FIR but implicated via confessions. The court noted the charge sheet was filed, the seized motorcycle belonged to the petitioner's father, and no cash was recovered.

What did the court decide?

petitioner directed to be released on bail on ₹10,000 bond with two sureties, subject to conditions of not committing similar offences and cooperation in trial.

Mithun Kumar @ Mithun Kumar Sahni Vs the State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8079 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-488 Year-2020 Thana- GORAUL District- Vaishali

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Mithun Kumar @ Mithun Kumar Sahni Son of Mahesh Sahni Resident of Village- Shahpur Khurd, P.S. Goraul (Kathara O.P.) District- Vaishali At Hajipur

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anish Chandra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Abhay Kumar, APP

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 11-07-2022

¶12

Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

¶13

petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

¶14

Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within a period of four weeks from today.

¶15

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Goraul (Katahara-O.P) P.S. Case No. 488 of 2020 registered for the offence under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 Arms Act.

¶16

The accused/petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and is in custody since 05.06.2021.

¶17

The allegation against the petitioner is to commit robbery and while committing so, taken away Rs. 33,643/-from dickey of motorcycle of the informant.

¶18

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the name of the petitioner surfaced on the basis of self confession as well as confessional statement of co-accused, namely,

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8079 of 2022(2) dt.11-07-2022 2/3

¶20

Sonu Kumar after apprehending in Baligaon P.S. Case No. 146 of 2020. It has also been submitted that no cash as alleged to be looted recovered from the possession of the petitioner. It has further been submitted that the motorcycle, which is alleged to be recovered from the possession of the petitioner is registered in the name of father of the petitioner and Registration Certificate of the same have been filed through supplementary affidavit dated 06.07.2022. It has further been submitted that the petitioner is involved in 08 (eight) criminal cases, in which, he is on bail in 06 (six) cases. While concluding the argument, it has been submitted that investigation has been completed, for which, charge-sheet has already been submitted in this case, as such, there is no chance of tampering with the evidence.

¶21

Learned APP, while opposing the prayer of bail, fairly conceded the fact that as per supplementary affidavit filed by the petitioner, it appears that Registration Certificate of seized motorcycle is in favour of father of the petitioner, namely, Mahesh Sahni.

¶22

Considering the facts and circumstances as mentioned above, as the seized motorcycle belongs to father of the petitioner coupled with the fact that charge-sheet has been submitted, let the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail in connection with Goraul (Katahara-O.P.) P.S. Case No. 488 of 2020 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with

¶23

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8079 of 2022(2) dt.11-07-2022

¶24

3/3

¶25

two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ist, Vaishali, subject to the following conditions:

¶26

“(i)That petitioner shall not involve in the similar nature of offence till the conclusion of trial, failing which, the State shall be at liberty to move before the Trial Court itself for the cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner.

¶27

(ii) Accused/Petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be physically present on each and every date before the Trial Court till conclusion of the trial and exemption from physical appearance be allowed by the Trial Court, only on medical ground of the petitioner duly supported by the documents.

¶28

(iii) That one of the bailors shall be Tara Devi, who is the mother of the petitioner and deponent of the present bail petition.”

¶29

(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)

¶30

S.Katyayan/ R.S.Sen/ U T

Mithun Kumar @ Mithun Kumar Sahni v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mithun Kumar @ Mithun Kumar Sahni v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rakesh Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Anand Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ranjit Kumar @ Ranjit Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Seema Kumari Vs the Central Bureau of Investigation, Patna.

Md. Irshad Vs The State of Bihar

Chhotan Yadav @ Kaimpi Yadav Vs the State of Bihar