Allowed

Rakesh Sharma v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC8 Jul 2022CR. MISC./3711/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment grants bail to the petitioner accused of illegal trading of illicit liquor. The release is conditional upon the petitioner not committing similar offences and cooperating with the trial, considering the recovery was from an open place and the investigation was complete.

What did the court decide?

Release of the petitioner on bail subject to a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties and specific conditions regarding future conduct and presence in court.

Rakesh Sharma Vs The State of Bihar — Corruption | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3711 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-476 Year-2020 Thana- GOVINDGANJ District- East

¶3

Champaran

¶4

======================================================

¶5

Rakesh Sharma Son of Mr. Ashok Sharma R/O Village- Khajuria Sharma Tola, Ward No.-1, P.S.- Govindganj, District- East Champaran

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shivam, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Suresh Prasad Singh, APP

¶10

======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶12

3 08-07-2022

¶13

Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

¶14

Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within a period of four weeks from today.

¶15

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Govindganj P.S. Case No. 476 of 2020 registered for the offence under Sections 272, 273 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶16

The accused/petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and is in custody since 29.10.2021.

¶17

The allegation against the petitioner is to involved in illegal trading of illicit liquor, where 1989 liters of IMFL was recovered.

¶18

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the recovery is from open place (‘Dalaan’) of the

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3711 of 2022(3) dt.08-07-2022 2/3

¶20

petitioner, as such, it cannot be said from the conscious physical possession of the petitioner. It is submitted that name of the petitioner surfaced on the basis of confessional statement of coaccused. While concluding the argument, it is submitted that petitioner is a man of clean antecedent and, moreover, investigation in this case is complete for which chargesheet has been submitted, as such, there is no chance of tampering with the evidence.

¶21

Learned APP appearing on behalf of the State while opposing the prayer of bail fairly conceded the fact that recovery is from open place, as per F.I.R.

¶22

Considering the facts and circumstances as mentioned above, as recovery is not from the conscious physical possession of the petitioner, who is a man of clean antecedent coupled with the fact that chargesheet has already been submitted, let the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail in connection with Govindganj P.S. Case No. 476 of 2020 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge, Excise Act, East Champaran at Motihari, subject to the following conditions:

¶23

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3711 of 2022(3) dt.08-07-2022 3/3

¶24

“(i) That accused/petitioner shall

¶25

not involve in the similar nature of offence till the conclusion of trial, failing which the State shall be at liberty to move before the Trial Court itself for the cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner.

¶26

(ii) Accused/Petitioner shall

¶27

cooperate in the trial and shall be physically present on each and every date before the Trial Court till conclusion of the trial and exemption from physical appearance be allowed by the Trial Court, only on medical ground of the petitioner, duly supported by the documents.

¶28

(iii) That one of the bailors shall be Santosh Kumar Sharma, who is the brother of the petitioner and deponent of the present bail petition.”

¶29

(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)

¶30

Ankit/-

¶31

U T

Rakesh Sharma v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rakesh Sharma v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Madan Mohan Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Sanjeev Ranjan Vs The State of Bihar

Kailash Chandra Sharma Vs The State Of Bihar

Anand Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ranjit Kumar @ Ranjit Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Kailash Munda Vs The State of Bihar