Allowed

Jitendra Yadav @ Jitendra Singh v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC20 Jan 2022CR. MISC./7393/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an anticipatory bail application regarding charges of assault and attempted murder, the Patna High Court granted bail on personal bond, directing the petitioner to furnish security within four weeks post-normalcy.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted on personal bond with a direction to furnish Rs.10,000 security with two sureties within eight weeks after normalcy.

Jitendra Yadav @ Jitendra Singh Vs The State of… — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7393 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-9 Year-2020 Thana- DARIHAT District- Rohtas

¶3

======================================================

¶4

JITENDRA YADAV @ JITENDRA SINGH Son of Late Somaru Singh Resident of Village- Paruhar, P.S.- Darihat, District- Rohtas at Sasaram.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Dipak Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

3 20-01-2022

¶13

Due to the third wave of COVID-19 Pandemic, the

¶14

matter is being taken up by way of Virtual Court proceeding.

¶15

The matter has been listed under the heading ‘For Orders’ under the orders of Hon’ble the Chief Justice.

¶16

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State through virtual mode.

¶17

Learned Counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, within a period of four weeks after restoration of normalcy.

¶18

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Darihat P.S. case No.09/20 registered under Sections 341, 323, 504, 307, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶19

Allegation is that the petitioner tied rope in the neck of son of the informant and dragged him, which led to oozing out

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7393 of 2021(3) dt.20-01-2022 2/3

¶21

of blood from neck and mouth.

¶22

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. The alleged occurrence is said to have taken place due to petty reason relating to irrigation of field. The nature of injury is said to be simple. Hence, no offence under Section 307 of the I.P.C. is made out.

¶23

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the complaint case/F.I.R.

¶24

It is necessary to indicate here that this Court while considering the prayer made in the present anticipatory bail application has taken note of the exponential rise in number of covid cases due to outbreak of third wave of Covid-19 pandemic. Further this Court can also not lose sight of the fact that the condition of jails is not conducive and suitable to the present situation which has arisen due to the sudden rise in covid cases.

¶25

Considering the facts and circumstances, the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks

¶26

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7393 of 2021(3) dt.20-01-2022 3/3

¶27

from today, be released on anticipatory bail on his personal bond to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas, Sasaram in connection with Darihat P.S. case No.09/20, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶28

Once the normalcy is restored, the petitioner shall furnish bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each within a period of eight weeks to the satisfaction of the Court concerned in connection with the aforesaid case.

¶29

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶30

Narendra/-

Jitendra Yadav @ Jitendra Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jitendra Yadav @ Jitendra Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ran Vijay Kumar Yadav @ Ran Vijay Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Sachchidanand Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Pintu Kumar Singh @ Akash Kumar Singh @ Akash Vs the State of Bihar

Mantu Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Satyendra Rai Vs the State of Bihar

Mausam Kumar @ Mausam Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar