Allowed

Pintu Kumar Singh @ Akash Kumar Singh @ Akash v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC19 Jan 2022CR. MISC./42182/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case involving robbery. Bail is to be availed on personal bonds within twelve weeks, following which monetary bonds and sureties must be furnished once normalcy is restored.

What did the court decide?

Grant of anticipatory bail on personal bonds within twelve weeks, with a direction to furnish Rs. 10,000 surety bonds after normalcy is restored.

Pintu Kumar Singh @ Akash Kumar Singh @ Akash Vs the… — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42182 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-200 Year-2021 Thana- GARKHA District- Saran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Pintu Kumar Singh @ Akash Kumar Singh @ Akash, aged about 21 years (M), S/O Ashok Singh, R/O Village-Lerua, P.S-Marhowrah, District-Saran (Chapra).

... ... Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Khurshid Anwar, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 19-01-2022

¶11

Due to the third wave of COVID-19 Pandemic, the matter is being taken up by way of Virtual Court proceeding.

¶12

The matter has been listed under the heading ‘For Orders’ under the orders of Hon’ble the Chief Justice.

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State through Virtual mode.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defects, as pointed out by the office, within a period of four weeks after restoration of normalcy.

¶15

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Garkha P.S. Case No. 200 of 2021 for the offence registered under Section 394 of the I.P.C.

¶16

The prosecution case, in brief, is that the personal

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42182 of 2021(2) dt.19-01-2022 2/3

¶18

belongings of the informant are alleged to have looted by the miscreants.

¶19

It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. He has falsely been implicated in the present case. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. As per prosecution case, personal belongings of the informant are alleged to have been looted by the miscreants. The name of the petitioner has transpired in the present case on the disclosure made by co-accused. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in the present case. Subsequently, a petition has been filed on behalf of the informant where he has retracted from his earlier statement made in the F.I.R.

¶20

On behalf of the learned counsel for the State, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

¶21

It is necessary to indicate here that this Court while considering the prayer made in the present anticipatory bail application has taken note of the exponential rise in number of covid cases due to outbreak of third wave of Covid-19 pandemic. Further this Court can also not lose sight of the fact that the condition of jails is not conducive and suitable to the

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42182 of 2021(2) dt.19-01-2022 3/3

¶23

present situation which has arisen due to the sudden rise in covid cases.

¶24

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on his personal bonds to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Chapra, in connection with Garkha P.S. Case No. 200 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶25

Once the normalcy is restored, the petitioner shall furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each within a period of eight weeks to the satisfaction of the court concerned in connection with the aforesaid case.

¶26

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶27

U.K./- U T

Pintu Kumar Singh @ Akash Kumar Singh @ Akash v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pintu Kumar Singh @ Akash Kumar Singh @ Akash v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ranjan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Raja Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Anup Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Ran Vijay Kumar Yadav @ Ran Vijay Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Sachchidanand Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Gulfam @ MD Gulfam Vs The State of Bihar