Allowed

Ram Kaliya Devi v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC25 Aug 2022CR. MISC./6708/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Misheling the court granted interim bail to two female petitioners apprehending arrest under sections 341, 323, 308 and 504/34 of IPC arising from a domestic land dispute. The order required removal of defects by the Stamp Reporter within one month. Alternatively, on surrender within four weeks, the petitioners were to be released on bail bond and two sureties on terms of Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties on surrender within four weeks; directed to remove Stamp Reporter's defects within one month.

Ram Kaliya Devi Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6708 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-169 Year-2020 Thana- NIMCHAKBATHANI District- Gaya

¶3

======================================================

¶4

RAM KALIYA DEVI Wife of - Mithilesh Yadav Resident of Village- Sonsa, P.S.- Nimchak Bathani, Distrct- Gaya.

¶5

Buti Yadav @ Sunita Devi Wife of Putun Yadav Resident of Village- Sonsa, P.S.- Nimchak Bathani, Distrct- Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sanjeev Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ram Sevak Choudhary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

The learned counsel for the petitioners is directed to

¶13

2 25-08-2022 The learned counsel for the petitioners is directed to remove all the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within one month.

¶14

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

¶15

The petitioners apprehend their arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 341, 323, 308 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code, registered in connection with Nimchak Bathani P.S.Case No. 169 of 2020.

¶16

The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that there is land dispute between the parties. Petitioners are ladies of clean antecedent. Actually, the

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6708 of 2022(2) dt.25-08-2022 2/2

¶18

occurrence took place between the male members and petitioners being ladies have falsely been implicated in this case.

¶19

Considering the above facts and circumstances as well the clean antecedent of the petitioners and also keeping in view that they are ladies, let them above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender within four weeks from the date of communication of this order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each, with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-X, Gaya in connection with Nimchak Bathani P.S.Case No. 169 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C.

¶20

Office shall ensure that all defects are removed by the petitioners within the stipulated time as provided hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court.

¶21

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)

¶22

HR/-

¶23

U T

Ram Kaliya Devi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Kaliya Devi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raju Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Shatrudhan Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Subodh Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Anku Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Prabhat Kumar Rajak @ Pappu Vs The State of Bihar

Moti Ram Vs The State of Bihar