Allowed

Subodh Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC24 Aug 2022CR. MISC./3609/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Rame Devi and Subodh Kumar Singh in connection with a dowry death case, conditional upon their removal of order defects within one month and appearance within four weeks. They are to provide a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties if they appear/surrender within four weeks, subject to conditions under Section 438(2) CrPC.

Subodh Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4801 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-181 Year-2021 Thana- PATORI District- Samastipur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

RAM DEVI @ RAMA DEVI Wife of Late Sonelal Singh Resident of Village - Hasanpur Tanda, P.S. - Patory, Distt. - Samastipur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

======================================================

¶10

with

¶11

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 3609 of 2022

¶12

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-181 Year-2021 Thana- PATORI District- Samastipur

¶13

====================================================== SUBODH KUMAR SINGH Son of Late Sonelal Singh Resident of Village - Hasanpur Tanda, P.S. - Patory, Distt. Samastipur.

¶14

... ... Petitioner/s

¶15

Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 4801 of 2022) For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Dhananjai Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Amit Kumar Rakesh (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 3609 of 2022) For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Dhananjai Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Sharda Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY

¶16

ORAL ORDER

¶17

2 24-08-2022

¶18

The learned counsel for the petitioners is directed to remove all the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within one month.

¶19

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

¶20

The petitioners apprehend their arrest for the

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4801 of 2022(2) dt.24-08-2022 2/3

¶22

offences alleged under Sections 304B and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code, registered in connection with Patory P.S.Case No. 181 of 2021.

¶23

As per allegation, the marriage of the informant’s daughter was solemnized with the petitioner Subodh Kumar Singh (Cr.Misc.No. 3609 of 2022). The couple were blessed with a female child, who is presently three years of age. It is further alleged that the informant got an information that the accused persons committed the death of his daughter due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry.

¶24

The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the deceased was suffering from acute Tuberculosis (Drug Resistant Tuberculosis). She was under treatment in Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital in New Delhi and also she was treated in National Institution of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Disease, New Delhi. She died due to chronic ailment of tuberculosis and this false case has been lodged. He has submitted further that when the informant perceived his mistake, he filed a compromise petition.

¶25

Considering the above facts and circumstances, let the petitioners of both the cases, above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender within four weeks from the date of

¶26

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4801 of 2022(2) dt.24-08-2022 3/3

¶27

communication of this order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each, with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM-II, Samastipur in connection with Patory P.S.Case No. 181 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C.

¶28

Office shall ensure that all defects are removed by the petitioners within the stipulated time as provided hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court.

¶29

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)

¶30

HR/-

¶31

U T

Subodh Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Subodh Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jago Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Mahesh Roy Vs The State of Bihar

Birendra Nath Prajapti @ Virendra Prajapti Vs The State of Bihar

Raju Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Shatrudhan Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Dhananjay Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar