Dismissed

Nand Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC3 Aug 2022CR. MISC./65579/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal miscellaneous matter under the Maintenance坻? Amendment Act, the Patna High Court rejected the petitioner’s bail application under Section 376 IPC due to direct allegations corroborated by the victim’s statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. The court directed the trial court to expedite the proceedings within nine months.

What did the court decide?

Bail rejected. Trial to be concluded within nine months.

Nand Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65579 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-71 Year-2020 Thana- PRANPUR District- Katihar

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Nand Kumar Yadav, S/O Parampat Yadav R/o- Gauripur, P.S.- Pranpur, Distt.Katihar.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. N.K. Agrawal, Sr. Adv. Mr.Sanjeev Kumar Singh, Adv. Mrs. Preety Kunwar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, APP ======================================================

¶7

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER

¶8

5 03-08-2022

¶9

Heard Mr. N.K. Agrawal, learned Senior Counsel for

¶10

the petitioner and Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, learned APP for the State.

¶11

Let the defect(s) be removed within four weeks of the complete start of the physical Court in normal course.

¶12

The petitioner is in judicial custody in connection with Pranpur (Roshna) P.S. Case No.71/2020 instituted under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

As per the FIR, the informant has alleged that while she was on a morning walk, the petitioner herein dragged her in the field and forcibly raped her. Before leaving, he threatened the informant that if the same is informed to anyone, she will have to face dire consequences.

¶14

In this case, case diary as also status report of the trial

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65579 of 2021(5) dt.03-08-2022 2/2

¶16

was called for and the same has been received/perused.

¶17

The statement of victim girl under Section 164 of the

¶18

Cr.P.C. is part of case diary and the girl has echoed the prosecution story in the said statement too.

¶19

Taking into account the direct allegation against the petitioner of raping the informant is in the FIR which finds corroborated in subsequent statement under Section of the 164 Cr.P.C, this Court is not inclined to grant the privilege of bail to him, which is hereby rejected.

¶20

As per the status report, charge was framed on 15.02.2022 and thereafter discharged petition was preferred on behalf of the accused/petitioner which was pending for hearing as per the report dated 25.05.2022.

¶21

The Trial court is directed to expedite the Trial and conclude the same preferably within a period of nine months.

¶22

(Rajiv Roy, J)

¶23

Prakash Narayan /- U T

Nand Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nand Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jitendra Kumar @ Jitendra Kumar Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Ashok Singh @ Ashok Kumar @ Ashok Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Arbind Kumar @ Arbind Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Bharat Baitha Vs The State of Bihar

Malti Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Amirka Baitha @ Amerika Baitha Vs The State of Bihar