Jitendra Kumar @ Jitendra Kumar Yadav v. the State of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
The Patna High Court rejected a bail application filed by a petitioner accused of facilitating a shooting incident resulting in death. The court cited the gravity of the offence, the petitioner's alleged role as a facilitator, and a false statement in the application.
What did the court decide?
The application for grant of privilege of bail is rejected. A defect in the application is recorded and directed to be removed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15571 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-237 Year-2021 Thana- MAGADH MEDICAL COLLEGE District- Gaya
====================================================== Jitendra Kumar @ Jitendra Kumar Yadav, Son of Brahamdeo Yadav Resident of Village - Dhanawan, P.S. - Bodh Gaya, District - Gaya.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vishwa Ranjan Choudhary, Advocate For the Informant : Mr. Shailesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Binod Kumar, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
ORAL ORDER
- 3 02-08-2022
- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the State and
the learned counsel for the informant.
Let the defect(s) be removed within four weeks of the complete start of the physical Court in normal course.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner who is alleged to be a facilitator of a killing and made a false statement in the bail application.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Jitendra Kumar @ Jitendra Kumar Yadav
- respondent
The State of Bihar
Coram
RAJIV ROY
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court