Allowed

Sonu Kumar @ Sonu v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC15 Apr 2022CR. MISC./60666/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A single-judge criminal miscellaneous bench heard a petition seeking regular bail in a case involving IPC offences and Arms Act violations. Finding that incriminating material was not recovered and chargesheet submitted, the court released the petitioner on bail with fixed conditions.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail by furnishing bonds of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-XV, Vaishali.

Sonu Kumar @ Sonu Vs the State of Bihar — Cheque Dishonour | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60666 of 2021

¶3

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-383 Year-2020 Thana- DESARI District- Vaishali

¶4

======================================================

¶5

Sonu Kumar @ Sonu, S/o Late Suresh Bhagat, R/o village- Murauatpur, P.S.Desari, Distt.- Vaishali

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sabal Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR

¶10

ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 15-04-2022

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to

¶13

remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks from today.

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶15

The petitioner seeks regular bail, who is in custody in connection with Desari P.S. Case No. 383 of 2020 for the offences punishable under Sections 399, 402, 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1-b) a, 26/35 of the Arms Act.

¶16

As per the prosecution case, it is alleged that on secret information regarding assemblage of some criminals, the police raided the place of occurrence and three persons were apprehended and on search incriminating materials have been

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60666 of 2021(2) dt.15-04-2022 2/4

¶18

recovered.

¶19

It is submitted on behalf of learned counsel for the petitioner that the name of the petitioner transpired on the confessional statement of co-accused Rahul Kumar, however, this petitioner has no concern with the persons, who were apprehended nor any concern with the alleged recovery. It is further submitted that nothing has been recovered from the person or possession of this petitioner, apart from the fact that investigation has already been concluded and the charge-sheet has also been submitted in this case and this petitioner is in custody since 15.06.2021. It is lastly submitted that one of the co-accused, namely, Nitish Kumar, who was apprehended by the police, has already been granted bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 21652 of 2021 vide order dated 24.09.2021, as contained in Annexure-2 to this application.

¶20

On the other hand, learned APP for the State opposes the bail application and drawn the attention of this Court towards the criminal antecedent of the petitioner, as he has been found involved in six other criminal cases. In reply to the aforesaid statement, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that out of six cases, the petitioner is on bail in three cases and in most of the cases he has been remanded from different cases.

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60666 of 2021(2) dt.15-04-2022 3/4

¶22

Having considered the submissions made on behalf of the parties and taking into consideration the fact that the name of the petitioner has come on the confessional statement of coaccused and no incriminating material has been recovered from the person or possession of this petitioner, apart from the fact that investigation has already been concluded and charge-sheet has also been submitted in this case and the petitioner is in custody since 15.06.2021, let the petitioner, named above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-XV, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Desari P.S. Case No. 383 of 2020 subject to the condition that one of the bailors will be the close relatives of the petitioner with further conditions which are as follows:-

¶23

(i) The petitioner will cooperate in conclusion of the

¶24

trial.

¶25

(ii) He will remain present on each and every date of trial till disposal of the case.

¶26

(iii) He will not try to tamper with the evidence or intimidate the witnesses to delay the disposal of trial.

¶27

(iv) In the event of default of two consecutive dates

¶28

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60666 of 2021(2) dt.15-04-2022 4/4

¶29

without any cogent reason, his bail bonds will liable to be cancelled.

¶30

(Harish Kumar, J)

¶31

uday/-

¶32

Sonu Kumar @ Sonu v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sonu Kumar @ Sonu v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kajal Sarkar Vs The State of Bihar

Rakesh Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Ajay Kumar @ Ajay Kanna @ Ajay Kana Vs The State of Bihar

Ranjit Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Krishan Gopal Sharma @ Nandlal Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Manoj Kumar Gupta Vs the State of Bihar