Allowed

Bhim Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC6 Apr 2022CR. MISC./57868/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application under Section 392 IPC, the petitioner claimed he was not named in the FIR and held on suspicion. The bench granted bail with conditions, noting lack of incriminating evidence or tanam-in-possessions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail by furnishing bonds of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions like cooperation in trial and no tampering with witnesses.

Bhim Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Cheque Dishonour | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57868 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-193 Year-2021 Thana- DARAUNDA District- Siwan

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Bhim Yadav S/o- Sri Krishna Yadav R/o Village- Kabilpura, P.S.- M.H. Nagar, District- Siwan.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Pandey, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mithlesh Kumar Khare, APP. ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 06-04-2022

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as

¶13

learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶14

The present application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner, above named, for grant of regular bail to the petitioner who has been made accused and put behind the bars in connection with Daraunda (M. H. Nagar) P. S. Case No. 193 of 2021 registered for the offences punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

As per the prosecution case, it is alleged that on 14.07.2021, while the informant was going to market, three persons came on a bike and intercepted the informant and on the gunpoint they snatched his golden chain and other valuables including A.T.M Card, PAN Card, Aadhar Card and mobile phone and fled away.

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57868 of 2021(2) dt.06-04-2022 2/3

¶17

It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the F.I.R. has been instituted against unknown miscreants. The name of the petitioner has come only on suspicion made by a spy. It is further submitted that this petitioner is in custody since 16.07.2021 but till date he has not been put on T.I.P., further, nothing incriminating has been recovered from the possession of this petitioner which suggest any complicity of this petitioner in the present case. It is next submitted that though the petitioner has found involved in four other cases as mentioned in Paragraph No. 3 to the petition. However, in all the cases the petitioner is on bail.

¶18

On the other hand, learned APP for the State opposes the prayer and submits that the petitioner has criminal antecedent.

¶19

Having considered the rival submissions and taking into account the fact that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and he is in custody since 16.07.2021 but till date he has not been put on T.I.P. nor any incriminating material has come during the course of the investigation which suggest the complicity of this petitioner in the present case, except suspicion. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57868 of 2021(2) dt.06-04-2022 3/3

¶21

thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Siwan in connection with Daraunda (M. H. Nagar) P. S. Case No. 193 of 2021, subject to the condition that one of the bailors will be the close relative of the petitioner with further conditions which are as

¶22

follows:-

¶23

(i) The petitioner will cooperate in conclusion of the trial.

¶24

(ii) He will remain present on each and every date of trial till disposal of the case.

¶25

(iii) He will not try to tamper with the evidence or intimidate the witnesses to delay the disposal of trial.

¶26

(iv) In the event of default of two consecutive dates without any cogent reason, his bail bonds will liable to be cancelled.

¶27

(Harish Kumar, J)

¶28

shakir/-

¶29

Bhim Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bhim Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhagesari Devi Vs the State of Bihar

Shivam Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Sarvjeet Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Birbal Sahani Vs the State of Bihar

Subhash Baitha Vs the State of Bihar

Dhaneshwar Ray Vs The State of Bihar