Allowed

Subhash Baitha v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC6 Apr 2022CR. MISC./57857/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge order granting regular bail to a petitioner arrested for alleged negligence leading to the collapse of a water tower under Sections 420, 409, 427/34 IPC. The court considered the absence of defalcation allegations, the petitioner's lack of antecedents, and released him on bonds.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing of Rs.20,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran.

Subhash Baitha Vs the State of Bihar — Corruption | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57857 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-435 Year-2020 Thana- JOGAPATTI District- West Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Subhash Baitha, S/O Jhallu Baitha, R/O Village- Mishrauli Darwalia, P.SYogapatti, District- West Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Shrivastava, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Parmeshwar Mehta, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR

¶9

ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 06-04-2022

¶11

Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks from today.

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶13

The petitioner seeks regular bail, who is in custody in connection with Yogapatti P.S. Case No. 435 of 2020 for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 409, 427/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

As per prosecution case, it is alleged that on account of negligence on the part of the President of WIMC and Secretary in execution of the work under Mukhyamantri Gramin

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57857 of 2021(2) dt.06-04-2022 2/4

¶16

Drinking Water Nishchay Yojana at Gram Panchayat, Hathiya, water tower was collapsed and it is further alleged that due to collapse of structure of water tower, huge loss was caused to the public exchequer.

¶17

It is submitted on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is the Ward Member and from bare perusal of the F.I.R. as well as enquiry report submitted by the three men committee, which is the part of the F.I.R., it appears that there is no allegation of defalcation, rather it is alleged that though the materials used in construction of water tower structure have been found to be as per the standard but only because of the non-observance of the technical directions and the negligence, the structure get collapsed and at best it is a case of negligence and not a case of defalcation of Government money. It is further submitted that after collapse of structure of Water Tower, the same has again been constructed by the petitioner and it is working properly. It is next submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the co-accused Chandra Kishore Ram, Ward Secretary, has already been granted bail by the Court below itself. The petitioner is in custody since 18.04.2021.

¶18

On the other hand, learned APP for the State submits that because of the negligence on the part of these accused

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57857 of 2021(2) dt.06-04-2022 3/4

¶20

persons, a huge loss has been caused to the Government, which is a public money.

¶21

Having considered the submissions made on behalf of the parties and taking into consideration the fact that enquiry report speaks about the negligence on the part of the petitioner because of non-observance of the Technical advise, which resulted into collapse of the structure and the fact that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 18.04.2021, let the petitioner, named above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Yogapatti P.S. Case No. 435 of 2020 with the following conditions:

¶22

(a) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court below and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court below and in case of his absence on two consecutive dates without any cogent reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

¶23

(b) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case the prosecution will be at liberty to move

¶24

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57857 of 2021(2) dt.06-04-2022 4/4

¶25

for cancellation of bail.

¶26

(Harish Kumar, J)

¶27

uday/-

¶28

U T

Subhash Baitha v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Subhash Baitha v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhagesari Devi Vs the State of Bihar

Shivam Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Sarvjeet Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Birbal Sahani Vs the State of Bihar

Dhaneshwar Ray Vs The State of Bihar

Bhim Yadav Vs The State of Bihar