Petitioners were acquitted by the trial court. Counsel sought withdrawal of the bail application as it became infructuous. The court dismissed the bail application accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56316 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-38 Year-2015 Thana- SIWAIPATTI District- Muzaffarpur
======================================================
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Chandra Shekhar Anand, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bharat Bhushan, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
ORAL ORDER
for the petitioner and Mr. Bharat Bhushan, who represents the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the petitioners have been acquitted by the trial court and as such he wants to withdraw the bail application as the same has become infructuous.
In view of the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.
Ravi/-
(Rajiv Roy, J)
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to withdraw the bail application being acquitted by the trial court and dismiss the application being withdrawn.
JAY PRAKASH SAH @ JAY PRAKASH GUPTA
RAHUL KUMAR
The State of Bihar
NARENDRA KUMAR
RAJIV ROY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
