Allowed

Binod Sahni v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC16 Dec 2022CR. MISC./54221/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an oral order arising out of a criminal case involving robbery under Section 392 IPC, the High Court at Patna granted bail to the petitioner who was detained due to mistaken identity. The bail was subject to strict conditions including strict appearance and restrictions on movement.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail with a bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties of Rs. 10,000 each, subject to strict conditions including appearing on every date and movement restrictions.

Binod Sahni Vs the State of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54221 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-211 Year-2022 Thana- GAIGHAT District- Muzaffarpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

BINOD SAHNI S/O LATE MOTI SAHNI Resident of village- Husainpur, P.S.- Bochahan, District- Muzaffarpur.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ADVOCATE GENERAL BIHAR PATNA PATNA HIGH COURT

¶7

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ganesh Prasad Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Jitendra Kumar Singh,APP ======================================================

¶8

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY

¶9

ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 16-12-2022

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, learned APP who represents the State through video conferencing in view of the Covid-19.

¶12

Let the defect(s), if any, as pointed out by the office be removed within four weeks.

¶13

The petitioner is in judicial custody in connection with Gaighat P.S. Case No. 211 of 2022 for the offences under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

The FIR has been lodged on the basis of the written report of the informant, Nagina Devi who was travelling in an Auto when some accused persons boarded it and after assaulting her tried to flee away with the bag containing gold and silver materials as also cash. However,

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54221 of 2022(2) dt.16-12-2022 2/4

¶16

on her raising alarm, the locals caught hold of the accused, the petitioner included while the other two managed to escape .That way, the petitioner came into custody.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he was a bonafide passenger in the Auto. However, while the accused persons fled away, under mistaken identity, the petitioner was picked up, thrashed and although as per the FIR itself, he was caught on the spot on 6.5.2022, he was produced on 7.5.2022 ( as stated in para-11 of the bail application ).

¶18

Taking into account the fact that the charge-sheet stands submitted and he is in custody since 7.5.2022, this Court is inclined to grant him privilege of bail with strict conditions in view of the fact that he has criminal antecedents.

¶19

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1^st Class, Muzaffarpur, in connection with Gaighat P.S. Case No. 211 of 2022, subject to the following conditions :-

¶20

(i) one of the bailor should be the family member

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54221 of 2022(2) dt.16-12-2022 3/4

¶22

of the petitioner who shall provide official document to show his/her bona fide;

¶23

(ii) the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his/her bail bond by the Trial Court itself;

¶24

(iii) the petitioner shall leave his district (Muzaffarpur) for a period of three months after providing name and address and police station of his place of stay during the said period and he shall be duty bound to visit the police station (where he will stay) every week to mark attendance;

¶25

(iv) upon return to his district, he shall visit the concerned police station every fortnight for the next six months to mark attendance;

¶26

(v) the petitioner shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds;

¶27

(vi) the petitioner shall desist from committing any criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds.

¶28

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54221 of 2022(2) dt.16-12-2022 4/4

¶29

With the aforesaid observations, the bail

¶30

application is allowed.

¶31

(Rajiv Roy, J)

¶32

Prakash Narayan/ Ajay-

¶33

U T

Binod Sahni v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Binod Sahni v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prem Nath Chaubey Vs Shalini Pathak

Arun Kumar Srivastava and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Shri Shambhu Bind @ Shambhu Vs The Union of India

Smt. Nutan Singh Vs the Estate of Shankar Sharan S

Mukesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Jay Prakash Sah @ Jay Prakash Gupta Vs The State of Bihar