Allowed

Rajesh Yadav @ Rajesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC15 Jun 2022CR. MISC./55710/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners facing charges under IPC Sections 447, 448, 341, 323, 324, 307, and 34 for alleged assault and attempt to murder. The court fixed bail bonds under Cr.P.C. Section 438(2) given their lack of criminal antecedents and simple nature of injuries.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties, payable to the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda, within eight weeks.

Rajesh Yadav @ Rajesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55710 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-215 Year-2020 Thana- GRIYAK District- Nalanda

¶3

======================================================

¶4

RAJESH YADAV @ RAJESH KUMAR, SON OF SARDAR YADAV R/O VILLAGE- GULJAR BIGHA, P.S.- GIRIYAK, DISTICT- NALANDA AT BIHARSHARIF

¶5

RAGHO YADAV @ RAVINDRA YADAV SON OF SARDAR YADAV R/O VILLAGE- GULJAR BIGHA, P.S.- GIRIYAK, DISTICT- NALANDA AT BIHARSHARIF

¶6

BINOD YADAV SON OF SARDAR YADAV R/O VILLAGE- GULJAR BIGHA, P.S.- GIRIYAK, DISTICT- NALANDA AT BIHARSHARIF

¶7

AKHILESH YADAV SON OF SARDAR YADAV R/O VILLAGEGULJAR BIGHA, P.S.- GIRIYAK, DISTICT- NALANDA AT BIHARSHARIF

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶12

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Manoj Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 15-06-2022

¶14

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and

¶15

the State.

¶16

The present petition has been filed on behalf of the petitioners, apprehending their arrest, in connection with Giriyak P. S. Case No. 215 of 2020, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 447, 448, 341, 323, 324, 307 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶17

As per the allegation, the petitioners assaulted the

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55710 of 2021(2) dt.15-06-2022 2/4

¶19

daughter of the informant on her head by means of lathi and garasa and when the informant came to rescue her, they also assaulted him.

¶20

The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the injuries suffered by the victim are simple in nature. There is a past dispute between the parties over a common passage. He has further submitted that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners. No overt act has been attributed to any of them.

¶21

It is also stated in paragraph no. 2 of the petition that no similar petition has earlier been filed by the petitioners either before this Court or before the Hon'ble Apex Court.

¶22

It has further been stated that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent.

¶23

The learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail.

¶24

Considering the afore-stated facts and

¶25

circumstances, the petitioners above-named, are directed to be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender

¶26

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55710 of 2021(2) dt.15-06-2022 3/4

¶27

before the court below within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt / production of a copy of this order, on their furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000 /- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Ld. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharsharif, District - Nalanda, in connection with Giriyak P. S. Case No. 215 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. and on the following conditions:

¶28

(i) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that the petitioners have any criminal antecedents, the learned court below shall cancel the bail bond of the petitioners after hearing them and getting satisfied that the petitioners have concealed their criminal antecedent despite their knowledge of the same.

¶29

(ii) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that statement regarding previous bail petition is wrong, the learned court below shall cancel the bail bond of the petitioners.

¶30

The application stands allowed accordingly.

¶31

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55710 of 2021(2) dt.15-06-2022 4/4

¶32

The learned counsel for the petitioners is directed

¶33

to remove all the defects pointed out by the office within a period of one month and the Registry is directed to issue the certified copy of this order only after removal of office objections.

¶34

(Jitendra Kumar, J)

¶35

skm/-

¶36

U T

Rajesh Yadav @ Rajesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajesh Yadav @ Rajesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Janardan Sah @ Janardhan Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Sandip Kumar @ Sandip Raut @ Sanjit Raut Vs The State of Bihar

Shivam Kumar @ Shiva Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Naresh Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Shambhu Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Chhotu @ Chandan Kumar Vs the State of Bihar